Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Stock

I was checking GM's stock price the other day. I check it every so often but recently, I've been doing it more because its been on a nice rise (from $19 to $26.50 a share) over the past few months. The market has decided to appreciate it again after GM's major plans to turn the company around. You can check out the stock here.

As I was saying, I was checking out the stock the other day and maxed out the chart (it goes back beyond 1965) and something struck my eye. It was the giant dip in 1975. This got me thinking -- wasn't the gas shortage around that time? So, I decided to dig a little deeper and found some statistics on the average gas prices for the past 35 years (the data I found was for California -- which can be found here)



As anyone can see, GM's stock price greatly decreased whenever gas prices shot up. The stock took a dive in 1975, 1982, 1992, and once again in 2006 as gas prices, adjusted for inflation, are almost at their highest. The average price of gas in 2005 was $2.47 while it was $2.50 in 1982.

I just thought it was some interesting data that I would pass on. Ford and Toyota showed similar patterns as well, although I couldn't find any data for Toyota prior to 1993.

Perhaps what's good for General Motors is good for America as the saying goes ... and vice versa.

Tags: , , , &

Friday, May 26, 2006

HomeDock

From Uncrate comes a story about a new iPod accessory that finally has a function that truly is useful. The item is the HomeDock Deluxe from DLO.


The new feature, a first in the industry according to Uncrate, displays the iPod's menu on your TV where you can you navigate from across the room (mainly sitting on your couch) with a remote. Additionally, you can hook up the iPod to your TV or home speaker system instead of investing in a dock and remote with little self-contained crappy speakers. Of course, the home speaker and remote features aren't new, but the TV menu capability is great.

Its too bad the device costs $150.

Tags: , &

Hater

So I have a new enemy in the world of blogs. A co-worker of mine recently created a blog about how much my blog sucks. Check it out here. Personally, I think its hilarious well except for the latest entry.

DISCLAIMER: There's an image that is really, really gross on it.

Tags:

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

Mahmood Ahmadi-Najad President of the Islamic Republic of Iran's Letter to President Bush

Ahmadinejad's letter to Bush

The following is a translation of the letter sent in Farsi by Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad to US President George W Bush. This version was released by United Nations diplomats. The letter was handed by Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki to the Swiss Embassy in Tehran, which then handed it to the Americans.

Mr George Bush, President of the United States of America:

For some time now I have been thinking, how one can justify the undeniable contradictions that exist in the international arena - which are being constantly debated, specially in political forums and among university students. Many questions remain unanswered. These have prompted me to discuss some of the contradictions and questions, in the hopes that it might bring about an opportunity to redress them. Can one be a follower of Jesus Christ (PBUH) [praise be upon his name], the great Messenger of God, feel obliged to respect human rights, present liberalism as a civilization model, announce one's opposition to the proliferation of nuclear weapons and WMDs [weapons of mass destruction], make war and terror his slogan, and finally, work towards the establishment of a unified international community - a community which Christ and the virtuous of the Earth will one day govern, but at the same time have countries attacked; the lives, reputations and possessions of people destroyed and on the slight chance of the ... of a ... criminals in a village or city, or convoy, or for example the entire village, city or convoy, set ablaze.

Or because of the possibility of the existence of WMDs in one country, it is occupied, around 100,000 people killed, its water sources, agriculture and industry destroyed, close to 180,000 foreign troops put on the ground, sanctity of private homes of citizens broken, and the country pushed back perhaps 50 years. At what price? Hundreds of billions of dollars spent from the treasury of one country and certain other countries and tens of thousands of young men and women - as occupation troops - put in harm's way, taken away from family and loved ones, their hands stained with the blood of others, subjected to so much psychological pressure that every day some commit suicide and those returning home suffer depression, become sickly and grapple with all sorts of ailments; while some are killed and their bodies handed to their families.

On the pretext of the existence of WMDs, this great tragedy came to engulf both the peoples of the occupied and the occupying country. Later it was revealed that no WMDs existed to begin with.

Of course Saddam [Hussein] was a murderous dictator. But the war was not waged to topple him, the announced goal of the war was to find and destroy weapons of mass destruction. He was toppled along the way towards another goal, nevertheless the people of the region are happy about it. I point out that throughout the many years of the ... war on Iran [in the 1980s], Saddam was supported by the West.

Mr President,

You might know that I am a teacher. My students ask me how can these actions be reconciled with the values outlined at the beginning of this letter and duty to the tradition of Jesus Christ (PBUH), the Messenger of peace and forgiveness. "


Or because of the possibility of the existence of WMDs in one country, it is occupied, around 100,000 people killed, its water sources, agriculture and industry destroyed, close to 180,000 foreign troops put on the ground, sanctity of private homes of citizens broken, and the country pushed back perhaps 50 years. At what price? Hundreds of billions of dollars spent from the treasury of one country and certain other countries and tens of thousands of young men and women - as occupation troops - put in harm's way, taken away from family and loved ones, their hands stained with the blood of others, subjected to so much psychological pressure that every day some commit suicide and those returning home suffer depression, become sickly and grapple with all sorts of ailments; while some are killed and their bodies handed to their families.

Mr President,

There are prisoners in Guantanamo Bay that have not been tried, have no legal representation, their families cannot see them and are obviously kept in a strange land outside their own country. There is no international monitoring of their conditions and fate. No one knows whether they are prisoners, POWs [prisoners of war], accused or criminals.

European investigators have confirmed the existence of secret prisons in Europe too. I could not correlate the abduction of a person, and him or her being kept in secret prisons, with the provisions of any judicial system. For that matter, I fail to understand how such actions correspond to the values outlined in the beginning of this letter, ie the teachings of Jesus Christ (PBUH), human rights and liberal values.

Young people, university students and ordinary people have many questions about the phenomenon of Israel. I am sure you are familiar with some of them. Throughout history many countries have been occupied, but I think the establishment of a new country with a new people, is a new phenomenon that is exclusive to our times.

Students are saying that 60 years ago such a country did not exist. The show old documents and globes and say try as we have, we have not been able to find a country named Israel.

I tell them to study the history of World War I and II. One of my students told me that during WWII, which more than tens of millions of people perished in, news about the war was quickly disseminated by the warring parties. Each touted their victories and the most recent battlefront defeat of the other party. After the war, they claimed that 6 million Jews had been killed. Six million people that were surely related to at least 2 million families.

Again let us assume that these events are true. Does that logically translate into the establishment of the state of Israel in the Middle East or support for such a state? How can this phenomenon be rationalized or explained?

Mr President,

I am sure you know how - and at what cost - Israel was established: Many thousands were killed in the process.
Millions of indigenous people were made refugees.
Hundred of thousands of hectares of farmland, olive plantations, towns and villages were destroyed.
This tragedy is not exclusive to the time of establishment; unfortunately it has been ongoing for 60 years now. A regime has been established which does not show mercy even to kids, destroys houses while the occupants are still in them, announces beforehand its list and plans to assassinate Palestinian figures and keeps thousands of Palestinians in prison. Such a phenomenon is unique - or at the very least extremely rare - in recent memory.

Another big question asked by people is why is this regime being supported? Is support for this regime in line with the teachings of Jesus Christ (PBUH) or Moses (PBUH) or liberal values? Or are we to understand that allowing the original inhabitants of these lands - inside and outside Palestine - whether they are Christian, Muslim or Jew, to determine their fate, runs contrary to principles of democracy, human rights and the teachings of prophets? If not, why is there so much opposition to a referendum?


Again let us assume that these events are true. Does that logically translate into the establishment of the state of Israel in the Middle East or support for such a state? How can this phenomenon be rationalized or explained?

The newly elected Palestinian administration recently took office. All independent observers have confirmed that this government represents the electorate. Unbelievingly, they have put the elected government under pressure and have advised it to recognize the Israeli regime, abandon the struggle and follow the programs of the previous government.

If the current Palestinian government had run on the above platform, would the Palestinian people have voted for it? Again, can such position taken in opposition to the Palestinian government be reconciled with the values outlined earlier? The people are also saying why are all UNSC [United Nations Security Council] resolutions in condemnation of Israel vetoed?

Mr President,
As you are well aware, I live among the people and am in constant contact with them - many people from around the Middle East manage to contact me as well. They do not have faith in these dubious policies either. There is evidence that the people of the region are becoming increasingly angry with such policies.

It is not my intention to pose too many questions, but I need to refer to other points as well.

Why is it that any technological and scientific achievement reached in the Middle East regions is translated into and portrayed as a threat to the Zionist regime? Is not scientific R&D [research and development] one of the basic rights of nations?

You are familiar with history. Aside from the Middle Ages, in what other point in history has scientific and technical progress been a crime? Can the possibility of scientific achievements being utilized for military purposes be reason enough to oppose science and technology altogether? If such a supposition is true, then all scientific disciplines, including physics, chemistry, mathematics, medicine, engineering, etc. must be opposed. "

Lies were told in the Iraqi matter. What was the result? I have no doubt that telling lies is reprehensible in any culture, and you do not like to be lied to.

Mr President,

Don't Latin Americans have the right to ask, why their elected governments are being opposed and coup leaders supported? Or, why must they constantly be threatened and live in fear? The people of Africa are hardworking, creative and talented. They can play an important and valuable role in providing for the needs of humanity and contribute to its material and spiritual progress. Poverty and hardship in large parts of Africa are preventing this from happening. Don't they have the right to ask why their enormous wealth - including minerals - is being looted, despite the fact that they need it more than others?

Again, do such actions correspond to the teachings of Christ and the tenets of human rights? The brave and faithful people of Iran too have many questions and grievances, including: the coup d'etat of 1953 and the subsequent toppling of the legal government of the day, opposition to the Islamic revolution [of 1979], transformation of an embassy into a headquarters supporting the activities of those opposing the Islamic Republic (many thousands of pages of documents corroborates this claim), support for Saddam in the war waged against Iran, the shooting down of the Iranian passenger plane, freezing the assets of the Iranian nation, increasing threats, anger and displeasure vis-a-vis the scientific and nuclear progress of the Iranian nation (just when all Iranians are jubilant and collaborating with their country's progress), and many other grievances that I will not refer to in this letter.

Mr President,

September 11 was a horrendous incident. The killing of innocents is deplorable and appalling in any part of the world. Our government immediately declared its disgust with the perpetrators and offered its condolences to the bereaved and expressed its sympathies.

All governments have a duty to protect the lives, property and good standing of their citizens. Reportedly your government employs extensive security, protection and intelligence systems - and even hunts its opponents abroad. September 11 was not a simple operation. Could it be planned and executed without coordination with intelligence and security services - or their extensive infiltration? Of course this is just an educated guess. Why have the various aspects of the attacks been kept secret? Why are we not told who botched their responsibilities? And, why aren't those responsible and the guilty parties identified and put on trial?

All governments have a duty to provide security and peace of mind for their citizens. For some years now, the people of your country and neighbors of world trouble spots do not have peace of mind. After 9-11, instead of healing and tending to the emotional wounds of the survivors and the American people - who had been immensely traumatized by the attacks - some Western media only intensified the climates of fear and insecurity - some constantly talked about the possibility of new terror attacks and kept the people in fear. Is that service to the American people? Is it possible to calculate the damages incurred from fear and panic?

American citizens lived in constant fear of fresh attacks that could come at any moment and in any place. They felt insecure in the streets, in their place of work and at home. Who would be happy with this situation? Why was the media, instead of conveying a feeling of security and providing peace of mind, giving rise to a feeling of insecurity?


Some believe that the hype paved the way - and was the justification - for an attack on Afghanistan. Again I need to refer to the role of media. In media charters, correct dissemination of information and honest reporting of a story are established tenets. I express my deep regret about the disregard shown by certain Western media for these principles. The main pretext for an attack on Iraq was the existence of WMDs. This was repeated incessantly - for the public to, finally, believe - and the ground set for an attack on Iraq.

Will the truth not be lost in a contrive and deceptive climate? Again, if the truth is allowed to be lost, how can that be reconciled with the earlier mentioned values? Is the truth known to the Almighty lost as well?

Mr President,
In countries around the world, citizens provide for the expenses of governments so that their governments in turn are able to serve them.

The question here is what has the hundreds of billions of dollars, spent every year to pay for the Iraqi campaign, produced for the citizens?

As your excellency is aware, in some states of your country, people are living in poverty. Many thousands are homeless and unemployment is a huge problem. Of course these problems exist - to a larger or lesser extent - in other countries as well. With these conditions in mind, can the gargantuan expenses of the campaign - paid from the public treasury - be explained and be consistent with the aforementioned principles?

Did we manage to bring peace, security and prosperity for the people or insecurity and unemployment? Did we intend to establish justice, or just supported especial interest groups, and by forcing many people to live in poverty and hardship, made a few people rich and powerful - thus trading the approval of the people and the Almighty with theirs? Did we defend the rights of the underprivileged or ignore them? Did we defend the rights of all people around the world or imposed wars on them, interfered illegally in their affairs, established hellish prisons and incarcerated some of them? Did we bring the world peace and security or raised the specter of intimidation and threats? Did we tell the truth to our nation and others around the world or presented an inverted version of it? Were we on the side of people or the occupiers and oppressors? Did our administration set out to promote rational behavior, logic, ethics, peace, fulfilling obligations, justice, service to the people, prosperity, progress and respect for human dignity or the force of guns? Intimidation, insecurity, disregard for the people, delaying the progress and excellence of other nations, and trample on people's rights? And finally, they will judge us on whether we remained true to our oath of office - to serve the people, which is our main task, and the traditions of the prophets- or not?


Mr President,

What has been said, are some of the grievances of the people around the world, in our region and in your country. But my main contention - which I am hoping you will agree to some of it - is: Those in power have specific time in office, and do not rule indefinitely, but their names will be recorded in history and will be constantly judged in the immediate and distant futures. The people will scrutinize our presidencies.


Mr President,

If billions of dollars spent on security, military campaigns and troop movement were instead spent on investment and assistance for poor countries, promotion of health, combating different diseases, education and improvement of mental and physical fitness, assistance to the victims of natural disasters, creation of employment opportunities and production, development projects and poverty alleviation, establishment of peace, mediation between disputing states and distinguishing the flames of racial, ethnic and other conflicts where would the world be today? Would not your government, and people be justifiably proud? Would not your administration's political and economic standing have been stronger? And I am most sorry to say, would there have been an ever increasing global hatred of the American governments?

Mr President, it is not my intention to distress anyone. If prophets Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ishmael, Joseph or Jesus Christ (PBUH) were with us today, how would they have judged such behavior? Will we be given a role to play in the promised world, where justice will become universal and Jesus Christ (PBUH) will be present? Will they even accept us?

My basic question is this: Is there no better way to interact with the rest of the world? Today there are hundreds of millions of Christians, hundreds of millions of Muslims and millions of people who follow the teachings of Moses (PBUH). All divine religions share and respect on word and that is monotheism or belief in a single God and no other in the world.

How much longer can the world tolerate this situation? Where will this trend lead the world to? How long must the people of the world pay for the incorrect decisions of some rulers? How much longer will the specter of insecurity - raised from the stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction - hunt the people of the world? How much longer will the blood of the innocent men, women and children be spilled on the streets, and people's houses destroyed over their heads? Are you pleased with the current condition of the world? Do you think present policies can continue?


The holy Koran stresses this common word and calls on all followers of divine religions and says: (3.64) "O followers of the Book! Come to an equitable proposition between us and you that we shall not serve any but Allah and (that) we shall not associate aught. With Him and (that) some of us shall not take others for lords besides Allah, but if they turn back, then say: Bear witness that we are Muslims. (The Family of Imran).

Mr President,

According to divine verses, we have all been called upon to worship one God and follow the teachings of divine prophets. To worship a God which is above all powers in the world and can do all He pleases. The Lord which knows that which is hidden and visible, the past and the future, knows what goes on in the Hearts of His servants and records their deeds. The Lord who is the possessor of the heavens and the earth and all universe is His court planning for the universe is done by His hands, and gives His servants the glad tidings of mercy and forgiveness of sins. He is the companion of the oppressed and the enemy of oppressors. He is the Compassionate, the Merciful. He is the recourse of the faithful and guides them towards the light from darkness. He is witness to the actions of His servants, He calls on servants to be faithful and do good deeds, and asks them to stay on the path of righteousness and remain steadfast . Calls on servants to heed His prophets and He is a witness to their deeds. A bad ending belongs only to those who have chosen the life of this world and disobey Him and oppress His servants. And a good and eternal paradise belong to those servants who fear His majesty and do not follow their lascivious selves.

We believe a return to the teachings of the divine prophets is the only road leading to salvations. I have been told that Your Excellency follows the teachings of Jesus (PBUH), and believes in the divine promise of the rule of the righteous on Earth.


We also believe that Jesus Christ (PBUH) was one of the great prophets of the Almighty. He has been repeatedly praised in the Koran. Jesus (PBUH) has been quoted in Koran as well; (19,36) "And surely Allah is my Lord and your Lord, therefore serves Him; this is the right path, Marium."

Service to and obedience of the Almighty is the credo of all divine messengers.

The God of all people in Europe, Asia, Africa, America, the Pacific and the rest of the world is one. He is the Almighty who wants to guide and give dignity to all His servants. He has given greatness to Humans. We again read in the Holy Book: The Almighty God sent His prophets with miracles and clear signs to guide the people and show them divine signs and purity them from sins and pollutions. And He sent the Book and the balance so that the people display justice and avoid the rebellious.

All of the above verses can be seen, one way or the other, in the Good Book as well.

Divine prophets have promised: the day will come when all humans will congregate before the court of the Almighty, so that their deeds are examined. The good will be directed towards Heaven and evildoers will meet divine retribution. I trust both of us believe in such a day, but it will not be easy to calculate the actions of rulers, because we must be answerable to our nations and all others whose lives have been directly or indirectly effected by our actions.

All prophets, speak of peace and tranquility for man - based on monotheism, justice and respect for human dignity.


Do you not think that if all of us come to believe in and abide by these principles, that is, monotheism, worship of God, justice, respect for the dignity of man, belief in the Last Day, we can overcome the present problems of the world - that are the result of disobedience to the Almighty and the teachings of prophets - and improve our performance?

Do you not think that belief in these principles promotes and guarantees peace, friendship and justice?
Do you not think that the aforementioned written or unwritten principles are universally respected?

Will you not accept this invitation? That is, a genuine return to the teachings of prophets, to monotheism and justice, to preserve human dignity and obedience to the Almighty and His prophets?

Mr President, History tells us that repressive and cruel governments do not survive. God has entrusted the fate of man to them. The Almighty has not left the universe and humanity to their own devices. Many things have happened contrary to the wishes and plans of governments. These tell us that there is a higher power at work and all events are determined by Him.

Can one deny the signs of change in the world today? Is this situation of the world today comparable to that of ten years ago? Changes happen fast and come at a furious pace.

The people of the world are not happy with the status quo and pay little heed to the promises and comments made by a number of influential world leaders. Many people around the world feel insecure and oppose the spreading of insecurity and war and do not approve of and accept dubious policies.

The people are protesting the increasing gap between the haves and the have-nots and the rich and poor countries.

The people are disgusted with increasing corruption.

The people of many countries are angry about the attacks on their cultural foundations and the disintegration of families. They are equally dismayed with the fading of care and compassion. The people of the world have no faith in international organizations, because their rights are not advocated by these organizations.

Liberalism and Western style democracy have not been able to help realize the ideals of humanity. Today these two concepts have failed. Those with insight can already hear the sounds of the shattering and fall of the ideology and thoughts of the liberal democratic systems.

We increasingly see that people around the world are flocking towards a main focal point - that is the Almighty God. Undoubtedly through faith in God and the teachings of the prophets, the people will conquer their problems. My question for you is: Do you not want to join them?

Mr President,

Whether we like it or not, the world is gravitating towards faith in the Almighty and justice and the will of God will prevail over all things.

Vasalam Ala Man Ataba'al hoda

Mahmood Ahmadi-Najad President of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Monday, May 22, 2006

But I'm the Juggernaut Bitch!

http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=15862


Tags:

Sunday, May 21, 2006

Gore

Have you ever imagined what the world would be like had Al Gore been elected sworn in as President instead of George W. Bush? Well, a week or two ago Saturday Night Live did just that. Here's the opening bit.

Tags: , , &

Thursday, May 18, 2006

Scary shit

This is one of my best friend's myspace blog entry from today. He's a marine and served one tour of duty in Iraq. He's now stationed in California with his wife and 4 children. He was never political or remotely close to being right wing before he left for boot camp. Now he's Sean Hannity's love child. I think they brainwash people in boot camp. Anyways, check this scary shit out. I thought the whole "love it or leave it" thing went out of fashion with Vietnam, but I guess that spirit is alive and well. He also made the Hannity mistake of blaming the soldier funeral protests on liberals when we know it's that wacko reverend Fred Phelps doing it. He's not the best speller either, but don't hold that aginst him. I wasn't going to bother correcting it either, strictly copy and paste.


THE ANTI-AMERICA COMMUNIST FUCKS
mood: annoyed
category: news and politics

Over the past few years, all I hear about is the American public do nothihing but bitch about how Bush is a bad leader, how our military shouldn't be in Iraq, and how all we are doing in Iraq is stealing oil. I remember right after 9/11, how all these people got pissed off about what had happened to our country, and the fact that we said we would hunt down the person responsible for it. here we are almost 5 years later, and our countries people have gone into their do things for myself and no one else phase. No one is telling you to fight this war. What pisses me off the most is seing our own people showing disrespect for our service members by having protests outside of their funerals, and saying how much they hate this country, and its leadership. How can you call yourself an American when you can't even show a little common courtesy for the people who fight for the rights and freedom that you have today. All these people think that they know how our government should be run, but they can't even voice it properly. I know that when I was in Iraq, I knew that if I were to die over there that at least my family would feel proud to know that I went out trying to provide other people with the same freedoms that we have today. All I see now is people making fun of our President, and you know what that tells the enemy? We can't even support ourselves, and that our country is weak. And all that is going to bring us is another 9/11! I think that all of these people who have nothing better to do, considering all the free time they have on their hands with protests and Bush bashing, they need to go and re-read our Constitution, our National Anthem, and our Pledge of Alligence. Thats what I fight for everyday while I serve my country in the Marines. I'm sure Paul Reveere didn't have anyone spit on him, or protest out side his home after he made his famous ride. I agree that being at war sucks, but it's something we all have to deal with. I guess what I'm trying to say here is this......IF YOU DON'T SUPPORT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND YOU LIVE HERE, THEN MOVE THE FUCK OUT! I know I don't want you here, and I know a hell of alot of people who feel the same way. No one is forcing you to stay here. Hell if you think that these people that we're fighting are such good people, then why don't you go move in with them.


Just remember, UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL.

Cpl Anonymous USMC


Tags:

Monday, May 15, 2006

This guy has way too much time on his hands

This is one of the coolest videos floating around on the net. Some guy simulated the bottom of the tenth inning of game 6 of the 1986 World Series (Mets-Red Sox, the Buckner error) using Nintendo RBI baseball and the actual television announcing from Vin Scully spliced in. This thing is perfect, it accounts for every pitch. It's 8 minutes long and it requires sound to get the full effect, so if you're at work, don't check it out, wait until you get home.





Tags:

Thursday, May 11, 2006

Ringtones

I got a new phone this week because my last one died on me. It turns on but for some reason none of the buttons work. Luckily my contract was going to expire in August and I was able to sign a new contract. So I picked upp the RAZR for $80, which is pretty sweet.

The phone is awesome. It looks badass. It has a speakerphone, a camera, and most importantly bluetooth. I love bluetooth equipped phones. I had it on my last phone too. With it, I'm able to sink the address book on the phone with the one on my laptop wirelessly. The best part is that it allows you to browse the files on the phone from a computer. This allows me to make my own ringtones and put them on the phone instead of buying them for $3.99 through Cingular. It kicks ass. So, I pretty much spent my afternoon making ringtones for people. This is what I came up with:
    Amanda -- Because she's pretty much obsessed with the song.
    Matt C. -- Because he wrote this song and its a slow jam for the ladies. I've heard that Beth dates him solely for it.
    Dad -- Because he works for GM.
    Dan -- Because his idol is Gordon Gecko.
    Dennis -- Because if he was a woman, he'd be having Springsteen's children.
    Diego -- Because he and the artist, Seu Jorge, are Brazilian.
    Doug -- Because he drives tractors at work.
    Matt B. -- Because he once played this song on repeat in his apartment for like two weeks or so.
    Mom -- Because she's annoyed that this is her ringtone again.
    Qdoba -- Because its in Spanish.
    Steve -- Because the song rules and he requested it.

    Everyone else -- Because its loud and awesome. Mmmm, Kelly Kapowski.
Anybody have suggestions or requests for their personalized ringtone?

For people who have the phone or pretty much any other phone with Bluetooth and want to know how to make their own ringtones, this is how I did it:
  1. Open up iTunes.
  2. Export the song you want
  3. Open the song up in Quicktime (you may need Quicktime Pro)
  4. Trim the song down to a 20 or 30 second segment
  5. Save the song as a .MOV file.
  6. Import the new file into iTunes
  7. Open the Preferences for iTunes
  8. Change the Importing function to MP3 Encoder and set a custom bitrate of 64kbps
  9. Find the imported file, right-click and select "Convert Selection to MP3"
  10. Export the file
  11. Transfer the file to your phone
Good luck.

Tags: , , , &

Roast

The White House Correspondence Dinner was a little while ago. This year Stephen Colbert, the host of The Colbert Report on Comedy Central, was the guest speaker. The character Stephen plays is one similar to Bill O'Reilly except thats its a very satirical take on him. Colbert's character is a staunch Republican who believes every word the President says and thinks that any criticism or deviation from what the President says is pretty much equivalent to heresy.

So it confused me when the committee chose Colbert as their guest. Why would they pick someone who's TV show blatantly skewers the administration? Did they not get it? Did they not understand that he would harshly lampoon them and the "liberal media" during the entire speech? I guess not. I suppose they thought he would go easy on them. Well, they were wrong and I was right. Well, except that I expected Colbert to mention how he hates bears and their "liberal bear agenda," a favorite topic on his show.

Colbert shredded the administration. He mocked the press and even took a shot at the First Lady and her reading initiative. His speech was the talked about for days after the event. Republican and Democrat talking heads couldn't understand why Colbert went where he did. They were disgusted that he didn't make it softer and more respectful, especially since the President was sitting about three feet away.

But how can you blame Colbert? He's famous for doing exactly what he did that night. The committee knew who he was and booked him anyway. Shouldn't the outrage be not on Colbert but instead on the committee that selected him. Of course not, there's no public figure that represents the selection committee. It's just easier to go after Colbert and it's ridiculous.

But, such is life in the public punditry that are the 24 hour news channels. Because they have a lack of material to report, they comment relentlessly to their base on three topics a day, repeating them over and over again.

Personally, I loved his speech even though it was awkward for the location and audience. I found it hilarious. You can check it out here. The other highlight of the night was when Bush was accompanied by a Bush impersonator for a speech. You can check that out here.

There were two lines that I really enjoyed. The first was when Colbert urged Bush to ignore his low approval ratings, saying they were based on reality, "and reality has a well-known liberal bias." The other was when he said that the recent shakeup in the administration was not simply rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic because "this administration is not sinking , its soaring." He went on say that it was rather rearranging deck chairs on the Hindenberg.

Tags: , , &

Friday, May 05, 2006

Vanity

I really don't like vanity plates. No matter how creative or funny they are, I don't like them. I tend to make fun of every one I see and think the people who have them are lame.

For one thing, they probably (I'm not looking up statistics) cause accidents. People tend to tailgate cars with vanity plates in an attempt to read and figure out. I include myself in this group. It is impossible to ignore the tendency of attempting to comprehend the gibberish that is a vanity plate. We should be focusing on driving down the road instead of trying to figure out that YTOK BUG means the Y2K Bug. Mind you, I saw this on a model year 2000 VW Bug. Lame.

Well, I was driving up to Michigan State to party with my brother Doug before he graduates tomorrow and I came across this on a Volvo station wagon:



For those who don't understand, GRFNDOR is supposed to represent Gryffindor, one of the four houses within the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry in the crappy Harry Potter novels. I can't think of a better way to alert the world to the fact that you're a nerd and enjoy sub-par literature that was written for children. Oh, the car had a second bumper sticker plastered on the side window saying something like how the car was protected by magic.

People amaze me.

Tags: , , &

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Knight

This guy has way too much time and money. Too bad the interior isn't tan like its supposed to be. Personally, all I really want to do is sit in it and push the turbo-boost button. But seriously, where can you buy the instrument panel for this thing? Who makes it?

Tags: , , &

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

Clarinet

It has come to my attention from a very credible blonde source that someone on this blog played the Clarinet in the school band. Doesn't this person know that the clarinet is for girls? Unfortunately, the name of the person wasn't given so I don't know who it was. I only know that they are a member of this blog so lets try to figure out who this fag is together.

I know that Steve, like myself, played the saxophone and I know that one of us was good and the other wasn't. Risky was in the percussion section of the marching band playing guitar. Wayne is Asian so he probably played the violin piano violin and piano. Sean is my annoying alter ego so he probably played the drums because they're loud and obnoxious. Dennis is a Springsteenist who believes non-Bruce music should be banned so I don't think he played any instruments.

So, who could it be? Who could be the fag that played the Clarinet in high school. I mean the clarinet's name just sounds gay. As Wayne said, "it should really be called the Clarinette."

Good thing this person played football to beef up his image.

Tags: , , &